4/17/2023 0 Comments Dedad pixel checkThe study was focused on the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) and on the single index IC. The influence of the (a) maximum likelihood estimation-ordered subsets-maximum a posteriori probability-one step late (MLE-OS-MAP-OSL) algorithm, using various subsets (1 to 21) and iterations (1 to 20) and (b) different scintillating crystals on PET scanner’s performance, was examined. A thin-film plane source aluminum (Al) foil, coated with a thin layer of silica and with a 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) bath distribution of 1 MBq was used. The case study for the assessment of the information content was the General Electric (GE) Discovery-ST PET scanner. Methods: The Geant4 Application for the Tomographic Emission (GATE) Monte Carlo (MC) package was used, and reconstructed images were obtained by using the software for tomographic image reconstruction (STIR). The accuracy of digital zoom appears equivalent to geometric magnification in diagnosing microcalcifications.īackground: The aim of the present study was to assess the upper information content bound of positron emission tomography (PET) images, by means of the information capacity (IC).The performance of digital zoom is comparable to magnification for detecting microcalcifications when newer detector technology and optimised imaging procedures are utilised.Diagnostic test studies and phantom studies using newer detector technology would contribute additional knowledge on this topic.Key Points The differences between the sensitivities and specificities were not statistically significant.Conclusionsĭigital zoom may be equivalent to magnification mammography. Pooled sensitivity for magnification and zoom calculated from the diagnostic test studies was 0.93 (95% CI 0.84–0.97) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.70–0.94), respectively. Phantom studies suggested that the size of microcalcifications, magnification or zoom factor, exposure factors and detector technology determine whether digital zoom is equivalent to magnification mammography in the detection of microcalcifications. A narrative approach was selected to summarise and compare findings regarding the detection of microcalcifications, while a hierarchical model with bivariate analysis was used for the meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing microcalcifications.ResultsNine studies were included. Diagnostic test studies, experimental breast phantom studies and a Monte Carlo phantom study were included. We ran an extended search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Engineering Village and Web of Science. _linkedin_partner_id="3704540" window._linkedin_data_partner_ids=window._linkedin_data_partner_ids || window._linkedin_data_partner_ids.To summarise and compare the performance of magnification mammography and digital zoom utilising a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system in the detection and diagnosis of microcalcifications.Methods While there are more scenarios where a pixel can be faulty and become bright pixel, these three summarize the most common situations pretty well. It depends on which sub-pixel happens to be stuck permanently, letting the light through. You might see little pixel dots on screen, that are either red, green, or blue. There are several types of that bright pixel. This we call a bright pixel (or lit bad pixel). However, when the entire pixel is stuck in the wrong position opposing to the one above, then all light can pass through that layer and it creates a white, bright pixel on screen. A small dark dot appears on the screen – that’s the bad pixel (or dead pixel). When for some reason one of those sub-pixels is stuck in the wrong position it starts blocking the light from passing through that layer. On a standard TFT display one pixel consists of three sub-pixels: red, green, and blue. We mean pixel dots on screen of an LCD that are not working properly: failing to reproduce the correct light levels. When we talk about Dead Pixels, we do not mean the mildly popular British sitcom about three friends fixated on a fictitious online role-playing game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |